Sunday, April 23, 2017
thenorphletpaperboy: You Lie, Governor!
thenorphletpaperboy: You Lie, Governor!: ARKANSAS BY Richard Mason You Lie, Governo...
You Lie, Governor!
ARKANSAS
BY
Richard Mason
You Lie,
Governor!
That’s
right Governor, when you say that you are committed to protect the Buffalo, the
Nation’s first National River and an Arkansas treasure, you are lying! You say,
you are depending on scientific studies to protect the river, when the
scientific community has already spoken, and the vast majority are confident
that the River will be polluted if the hog farm continues to operate. How much
more scientific evidence do you need? So
quit posturing! Show me one lying
geologist who thinks the hog farm is no threat to the Buffalo, and I’ll show
you a hundred who say it’s an almost certainty the hog farm will sooner or
later pollute our National River. Governor, you are being “Politically Correct.”
I know you are thinking what does politics have to do with the Buffalo? Okay,
let's look at the facts, and see if our National River is in danger of being
harmed by our being “politically correct.”
But, first, are we just crying wolf about the Buffalo being
endangered? Crying wolf means there is no wolf, and on the Buffalo that means
the river is pristine and not being impacted or endangered by present or
endangered by future actions. The answer is obvious. We are not crying wolf. The
river may be already impacted by the Factory Hog farm as they dump hog manure in
11 fields in the Buffalo River’s watershed. This year the river has miles of
out-of-control algae so thick that it covers a large part of the river. That is
a nitrogen algae bloom that can be directly tied runoff coming from the river’s
watershed. There are many possible sources, but I’m convinced the Factory Hog
farm, which is producing an amount of waste each year equal to a town of
20,000, probably the main culprit. With
that amount of untreated waste being dumped on land in the watershed to let
Mother Nature dispose of it, where is it going to go? Rains will certainly wash
a lot of it into streams nearby, and what body of water do these streams flow
into? You guessed it: the Buffalo
National River! But that's not the biggest threat to the Buffalo. The
Commission of the A. D. E. Q. allowed the factory hog farm to be sited on the worst
possible geologic formation in the state, the Boone Limestone. The
water that doesn't run off percolates into the Swiss Cheese Limestone, and that
water ultimately ends up in the Buffalo. As a geologist with an advanced
degree, who has worked on the ground in the watershed area, and has written a Master’s
thesis on the geology of the area, I believe it is a virtual certainty that
with this huge amount of hog mature that over the years will be dumped on the
Buffalo watershed, the river will be lost forever if the permit isn't revoked. That
Governor, is scientific evidence that any competent geologist will confirm.
Check with Dr. Walter Manger, Chairman Emeritus of the Geoscience Department of
the University if you don’t believe me.
For just a moment, try to think about the amount of hog
manure that will be dumped on the 11 fields----over the next 10 years—it’s
equal to the waste of a city of 200,000 people! Governor, if you are honest in
your analysis, you will know the Buffalo we now know today will be gone forever
in less than 10 years. How are you going to feel when the National Park Service
prohibits swimming in the River and then fishing, and finally closes the River
for all recreational use?
Yes, Governor, you have appointed a new commission, and
supposedly this commission is supposed to protect the Buffalo River. However, there
is nothing in the commission's charge of action that will give it the power to
suspend the current factory farm permit that allows the operator to have as
many as 6500 pigs on site. The commission is not a regulatory body, and it
cannot regulate what goes in the river.
If the current factory farm isn't shut down, it is an
almost certainty that the River will be polluted to the extent that it will
become toxic. But what really bothers me is that being politically correct is
going to be the reason the River will one day be closed to swimming and fishing.
Governor, you are a Republican, but the River’s health should be non-partisan,
and I would think an order to suspend the permit because of the great threat of
pollution would be praised by Republicans and Democrats alike.
Governor, this is not the time to be politically correct,
and when the pollutions seep into the Swiss Cheese Boone Limestone, and begin
to enter the river it will be too late. The seepage will probably continue for
years to come even if the hog farm is shut down, and you, by being politically
correct, will be blamed. Yes, Governor, if the Buffalo is polluted, it will be
your fault, because you could have protected the River.
If
we're to save the river the factory hog farm must be closed and sited on a more
suitable terrain. Only then will the river be saved.
Saturday, April 15, 2017
thenorphletpaperboy: A Token Woman
thenorphletpaperboy: A Token Woman: ARKANSAS BY Share if you believe in equal rights for women. RICHARD MASON ...
A Token Woman
ARKANSAS
BY
RICHARD MASON
A Token Woman
Well, huh; what is a token woman? Of course, we all know,
but we conveniently just ignore the situation when we see boards and
commissions as either male only or with a 'token' woman. Yes, almost all of our boards, commissions,
etc are made up of old, white men who either reappoint each other or wait until
the old, white governor or old, white mayor appoints another old, white man to
fill a vacancy. Yes, and when, low and behold, a token woman is appointed to a
board of 15 old, white men, where they can brag, "We have the woman on our boards." Yes, I know you
might say a token woman is better than not having a woman at all, but that
doesn't make it right. "That's just the way our political system works"
you might say, and you'd be as dead wrong as 'colored rest rooms'. Or you might
say, "We can't find any qualified women to serve." Really? If I were
a woman, and some old, white man told me, "We couldn't find any qualified
women." I'd slap his face halfway to Louisiana. With at least a million
women to pick from why can't our old, white governor find one to put on the all
old, white man Highway Commission or Game or Fish Commission or...etc...or etc.
I've served on a number of commissions and boards, and from
first-hand experience I can assure you an equal number of women on those boards
would have improved their function immensely. Actually, there have been several
nationwide studies that confirm a commission with a equal representation of
women is more effective than a male only board, and while we're at it please
explain why a woman can't be paid a salary equal to a man's for doing the same job?
Yes, it is discrimination just as much as 'colored rest rooms', but obviously
we don't have the guts to stand up and yell "discrimination!" it to
our elected representatives.
Of course, we
believe the good old USA leads the world in virtually everything, but we're
sorely lacking in gender equality. Western European Nations are head and
shoulder ahead of us, and several countries have passed laws mandating equal
pay and representation for women.[1]
I know you think it would choke a mule to see our government pass a law
mandating equal representation on all public corporations, boards, and
commissions. Well, we have laws against discrimination in housing, hiring, and
a list of other areas of discrimination as long as your arm, so why not make it
a law, and have equal representation? Maybe, if our state legislature could
quit trying to pick a state book, duck, or dinosaur, they would have time to address
discrimination that affects over 50% of the state's population.
Okay, so the USA is
behind Western Europe in gender equality, but how does our state rank
nationwide? How about 43rd? A behind the
times country, and we live in a state that is bringing up the rear. Yes, it is[2]
a shame when you look at local commissions and boards with just a token woman,
and then it's even more shocking when our old, white Governor continues to
foster all male boards. Yes, that's the problem, it's the old, white men who
control virtually all the boards, commissions, and an old, white-haired
governor. (Yes, I know I've overused 'old, white men' but those rascals are the
root cause of gender discrimination.)
If we want a well-run representative democracy, it’s up to
us. We must post the membership of every local and statewide board and
commission, and when vacancies come up, nominate and insist women be appointed.
It was a hundred years ago when women received the right to vote and their
right to vote was bitterly fought by the same type of old, white men who are opposing gender equality. Only today, it's more
backroom work of old, white men, and only when a list of new appointees are
announced or printed in the paper do we realize women have been screwed again,
when we see the next Highway Commissioner is a man.
If women were given equal representation and equal pay, our
country would have a more representative government. It would increase
productivity and efficiency creating thousands of new jobs and improve our quality
of life immensely.
Saturday, April 8, 2017
thenorphletpaperboy: The Uglist Street in Town
thenorphletpaperboy: The Uglist Street in Town: ARKANSAS BY RICHARD MASON ...
The Uglist Street in Town
ARKANSAS
BY
RICHARD MASON
The Ugliest
Street in Town
Well, just go to
your local McDonalds, and you'll usually be there. No, it's not McDonalds that
makes the street ugly, it's what's there along the street and what is not
there. Yeah, I know that doesn't make much sense, but stay with me, and I'll
tell you why it's ugly and why it makes big difference to a town.
Since I mentioned
McDonalds; let's start there. We were in a distant state, and decided to stop
at McDonalds for our morning cup of coffee. We were downtown, but the main
gateway street into town was just a few blocks away, and in a few minutes we
were there and sure enough there was good old McDonalds, the familiar sign, and
the Golden Arches. However, instead of a
giant sign on a massive pole, there was---believe it or not---a three-foot-tall
sign! Which brings us to point one in making your ugliest street less of an
eyesore: Your town should have a tough sign ordinance. Just imagine how your
ugly street would look if every business had a maximum three foot sign and all
the billboards were gone.
But we're not finished. Next, another ugly
street eyesore: The mass of overhead utility lines and poles. Put them
underground and save hundreds of thousands of dollars when a drunk knocks down
a utility pole and every business along the street shuts down. Of course, minus
the overhead utility poles and lines, and you have moved up a notch in making
the ugliest street in town look better.
Okay, the street
looks better, but we're not through. Every one of these streets usually has
another item in common--- huge, blank parking lots, and most of them don't have
a speck of green. A progressive city will have an ordinance that requires at
least 25% of these parking lots to be green space. Just drive by one of your
street’s blank parking lot and visualize how it would look is a quarter of the
lot were green space, and of course it can be done without losing a parking
place. Yes, planting grass, shrubs, and trees cost money, but according to
several Government surveys, retail sales in the adjacent stores will increase
by as much as 25% and the customers will perceive the goods offered in the
stores are worth more. Of courses, we’ve all seen the big box stores with the
blank parking lots try to increase sales by dressing up the front of their
building or malls, but without the other items it really is like ‘putting
lipstick on a pig.’ Add the 25% greenspace in parking lots to your ugly street,
and we're almost there.
But we’re not
through with your ugly street yet, and the last item is very likely the most
critical one if we are going to change the appearance of a street. It’s time
for the city to step in and spend a few dollars. Every city street has
right-of-way on either side of the curb that gives the city plenty of room to
spend a small amount of money for a big reward, and that's to plant a street
tree every 25 feet. Now, if you look down your ugly street and visualize all of
the improvement, it’s easy to see how that street can be transformed into an
inviting gateway street into your town.
Okay, but why would
a city require all of the above? After all, isn’t just beautifying an ugly
street really just fluff and wasting money? Absolutely not! These gateway
streets are first impression streets, because they are usually the main
entryway into a town. A visitor will either have a good first impression or
they won’t, strictly based on the appearance of this major street. That’s why
states and cities that are growing with new businesses and new residents
arriving almost daily have beautiful avenues instead of dismal, ugly streets.
The money spent to transform an ugly street will repay a community a hundred
times over. So the next time you drive down your town’s ugliest street just
think about what someone who just drove into town for the first time would
think. If we want more quality jobs, and see our towns and cities grow, the
first critical step is to convert our ugliest street in town into a pleasing visual
scene instead of letting it stay an eyesore. Trying to recruit new businesses
to locate in our empty industrial parks is a waste of time, if our gateway
streets continue to look like the entrance to Dogpatch!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)