Sunday, March 18, 2018
thenorphletpaperboy: Jobs, But Not Just Any Job
thenorphletpaperboy: Jobs, But Not Just Any Job: Jobs, But Not Just Any Job Of course, there is a reoccurring need in our state for jobs and as more and ...
Jobs, But Not Just Any Job
Jobs, But Not Just Any Job
Of course, there is a reoccurring need in our state for
jobs and as more and more folks enter the marketplace it is important we have
work for them. However, it is my opinion that our fair state has never seen a
job it didn’t like, and yes, of course, there are bad jobs. Well, are we are still recruiting bad jobs? Hey,
you bet we are! This ain’t Vermont. It can be a hog farm on the Buffalo Watershed
or a polluting Chinese Pulp Mill or a maximum security prison. “Bring “um on if
they create jobs, seems our goal.
During the six years I served on what was then the
Pollution Control and Ecology Commission, many times the question, when a
potentially threat to the environment came up when considering a permit, the
question was, “How many jobs will that create?” Not “How will this plant or
permit impact our environment?” In the past, and sadly even today, any job
created in the state is welcomed with open arms. A lot of these jobs here today
came to our state because we had and still have lax environmental regulations.
Well, times have changed in our country, but has our state
changed, or do we still have the old mantra, there are no bad jobs? Let’s
consider a few facts for a moment. Fact number one, the country is at full
employment, and there are over 6,000,000 want ads out there looking for
workers. In other words, if you have a pulse, you can find a job. Fact number two, there are good jobs to
recruit and there are bad jobs. Fact number three, obviously, we should recruit
just the good jobs, but we aren’t. First, let’s talk about what are bad jobs. I
guess it’s a gimme to say that if a job has a negative impact on the air,
water, and land in the state, it sure doesn’t come out as a job we want to
recruit. Of course, the hog farm on the Buffalo River Watershed flashes before
my eyes, but of course that not the only source of bad jobs. What about a
Chinese pulp mill? You can’t process pulp without some pollution, and we
already do our Nation’s share of pulp wood processing. The Chinese pulp mill is
five miles from Arkadelphia, and unless the Chinese have come up with a
non-polluting paper mill, you can’t process pulp without some pollution. Just for a moment visualize all those Chinese
who wear masks because their air is so polluted, and then consider them
building a pulp plant in Arkansas. Anyone who has been anywhere within 20 miles
of a paper mill knows the smell. I’ve even smelled the mill near Pine Bluff in
Little Rock, So when the fans sitting in the stands during the football “Battle
for the Ravine” get a whiff of paper processing that will make them want to
gag, will they just say, “Oh, wonderful. It smells like jobs and money!” No, at
that moment most of the folks are going to say “stinking paper mill.” I think you get the idea. There are good jobs
and a polluting plant’s jobs aren’t good jobs. I opposed that paper mill when
Union County was in the running for the plant, and a few years back when Union
County was close to getting a new maximum security prison, I and others opposed
it.
I think you get the
idea, but the more important point is what and where are the good jobs? The
jobs we should go after. Let’s consider
one more fact. There are thousands of skilled high-tech workers who live in
mega-cities, and they want out. Some are looking to early retire and other have
had the traffic, pollution, and the hectic 2 hour commutes have them looking to
relocate. This is what they prefer. They want a smaller attractive town with a
mild climate that offers them the amenities they have become accustom to
having. The towns and states that attract these skilled individuals will be the
towns and states that will prosper in the 21sr century.
However, the bad news is we have very few if any towns that
have all of what these individuals want, but the good news is the items they
want are the same things we want. These are the quality of life perks everyone
wants. These skilled individuals have jobs and the last thing on their list is
an empty industrial park. Actually, our state has dozens of vacant or near
vacant industrial park that should be turned into a quality subdivision, which
would be attractive to these skilled workers. But let’s cut to the chase. These
skilled workers want good entertainment, quality restaurants, good schools, an
attractive downtown, and a low crime rate. So let’s get after it and stop
trying to win the jobs lottery, and cut out the junkets to China etc. if we
really want to have a growing and vital town, we will spend what it takes to
create these amenities, and use our resources wisely. If we don’t, many of our
towns will slowly waste away until their schools close, and they are merged
with a bigger school district. In a few years many of these towns will actually
cease to exist. But there are ways to stem the outflow.
El Dorado, hired Roger Brooks, a destination expert from
Seattle to turn the city around, and that is exactly what MAD, the Murphy Art’s District folks are
trying to do. Mr. Brooks said, “If a town doesn’t become a destination for
people to visit, it will slowly lose population and one day cease to exist.”
The results so far are encouraging. The opening of Phase
One, the Griffin Restaurant, MAD Amphitheater, and MAD Music Hall drew crowds
larger than the population of El Dorado, and these folks came from far and wide.
Phase One is still a work in progress and the largest children’s PlayScape in
the state will open on May 15th. Phase Two will add a new 8000
square foot art museum art with display arrangements from regional and national
museums. The final part of the project will be the renovation of the crown
jewel, the Rialto Theater, which will be a Lincoln Center quality Vaudeville
and Broadway Play venue. MAD is the key to attract the skilled tech
professional who will move to El Dorado, reverse the population drain, and,
create jobs.
No, you’re right, every town in the
state can’t be an entertainment destination, but our state has such an
abundance of natural beauty that by focusing our efforts and building on that natural
beauty, we could make our state truly the Natural State and thus provide many
of the amenities these skilled workers are looking for. Yes, that would
eliminate those junkets to China and Europe, and countless other lottery level
pursuits we see our towns wasting money on. If we use our limited funds wisely
to enhance our towns, we will not only attract these skilled workers who will
create jobs, we will increase the quality of life for all of us.
Monday, March 5, 2018
thenorphletpaperboy: Things I Like and Things I Dislike
thenorphletpaperboy: Things I Like and Things I Dislike: Likes and Dislikes Linsey Vonn: I think she’s great! No, she didn’t win gold, but her courage in coming...
Things I Like and Things I Dislike
Likes and Dislikes
Linsey Vonn: I think she’s great! No, she didn’t win gold, but her courage in
coming back from what was almost a career ending accident and showing such
class when she didn’t win gold, makes me proud to be an American. Her bronze
medal in the Ladies Downhill makes her the oldest female ever to medal in in
the toughest of the ski events. This country has a lot of Linsey Vonn’s and
their courage and character are examples to our young people. Of course, it
doesn’t hurt her image by being a drop-dead gorgeous blonde.
Over the top makeup and ultra-white
teeth: I don’t like them: HD
TV gives us a very up close look at politicians and TV personalities and it’s such
an intense look that it can be a real turnoff. You know, teeth that are so
ultra-white they almost glow in the dark, and when person gives you that big
toothy smile, you feel like putting on sunglasses. That combined with an orange
spray-tan or heavy makeup makes those folks look like cartoon characters. Adult
healthy teeth are a soft shade of white with just a hint of color. Of course,
I’m all for a little soft makeup on the gals, but guys, please forget the makeup.
Eleven o’clock football games: I can’t
stand them: Well, I guess
some folks will do virtually anything for money, and whoever agreed to let the
TV people bribe them with sacks of money to move some of the University’s
football games to the ungodly hour of eleven o’clock, should be taken out and
horse-whipped. And what makes it even worse, we have to sit there and suffer
through around 60 minutes of commercials to see two losers play for the cellar.
Football games should be at the God-pronounced starting time of 2:00 P. M., always
on Saturday. Of course, I think all students should get tickets when they pay
tuition and all parking around the stadium should be on a first come basis.
Yes, all of that would screw up what is passed off as a football game, and that
ain’t bad. Maybe then we would get back to what the original college football
games were meant to be.
Going on and on about the Royals: I
can’t stand the coverage: Of
course, I mean the “Royals” of England. Well, they seem to be nice people, but
in reality, they are just tourist attractions, and to dwell on every little
tittle and twiddle the Royals make is just clogging up the media. The hoopla
about the forthcoming marriage was the lead TV story several weeks back, and I
think it should have been given about as much coverage as a new ride at Disney
World. So back off media and quit acting as if these people are special.
Rainy Days in Arkansas: I like them: Well, I guess when the weather man says “We
have a good weather weekend ahead.” He’s a fair weather man or woman, but I’m
not. Arkansas needs the +50 inches of rain a year, and when we go through a
long dry spell, it really has a negative impact on our State. So, I like a
rainy day. Yes, I know too much of even a good thing can create problems, but
Mother Nature sometimes needs to flush out the excess with a good four to six
inch rain that recharges the ground water, fills out lakes, and gives us the
forests that we take for granted.
Living with Wildlife: I like it: I’m a former country boy who lived on a farm
and hunted and fished at least two or three times a week from the time I was 8
years old until I went off to college. Today, I’m settled into a nice, wooded piece
property in the city limits of El Dorado with two small ponds, and plenty of
wildlife. We have a big wooden deck off our kitchen, and under that deck lives
a variety of animals; possums, coons, snakes, and spiders. And when we finish
with our Thanksgiving Turkey, it’s just put out the scraps and they disappears
by morning. Nothing is left. Our two ponds have plenty of ducks, fish, turtles,
snakes, and an occasional beaver. A couple of years back we had a river otter
check out our swimming pool. No fish; and it left after a display of swimming
and diving. Our lower pond has a small island in the center and the large
willow tree there has become an egret roost with some +20 egrets roosting
there. Of course we have deer---doesn’t everybody? A couple of years back a doe
gave birth to twins---in our courtyard. I think the coyotes I see occasionally
made the deer come in close to our house to birth her fawns. I walk and
sometimes run on the bypass just a few hundred yards from our house, and
recently I spotted a substantial beaver dam on Mill Creek, which crosses the
bypass just north from my house. And believe it or not, Vertis, my wife, spotted
a black bear crossing our neighbor’s yard about 5:30 one morning. It must have
been one of the Felsenthal bears out for a stroll.
I’m a Gal-hugging Southerner: And I
really like that:: But no, I
am not sexually assaulting the ladies, I’m just doing what Southerners have
been doing from the time there was a South, and I occasionally hug guys. Okay,
I know the difference in sexually assaulting and a friendly Southern Hug, but
yes, it does cross my mind when a close female friend comes to dinner, and I greet
her with a hug and maybe a kiss on the cheek. However, if we quit hugging it
would take away some of the positive relationships southern friends have
developed. So I’m confessing, yes, I hug, and I’m not stopping.
Politicians Who Won’t Have Town Hall
Meeting: I don’t like them: Of
course we all know why they won’t have town hall meeting. They can’t handle the
tough questions, and they don’t like folks questioning their motives for the
way they vote. I’m personally inviting any one or all of our congressional
delegation, especially Congressman Bruce Westerman, to come down to the Griffin
Auditorium in El Dorado that holds 2200 folks for an old fashion Norman
Rockwell town hall. Of course, we’ll ask Congressman Westerman to explain his
comment about whether the hog farm will pollute the Buffalo. Westerman
was in Hot Springs for a Coffee with your Congressman, and reportedly told the
crowd in response to a question about the Buffalo River Hog Farm, that he
believed swimmers put more nitrates in the river than the farm. I know it’s hard to believe he said that, but
it sounds as if the fall election may be a referendum on the Buffalo National
River.
Well, of course,
that’s just a few of my likes and dislikes, but I’m probably going to still
watch the Hogs on TV at 11, put up with politicians who won’t have a Town Hall
Meeting, and hug the gals with ultra-white teeth.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
thenorphletpaperboy: Common Sense Gun Control
thenorphletpaperboy: Common Sense Gun Control: Common Sense Gun Control Well, yeah, I’m going to dive into the gun control deep water, and here’s a heads...
Common Sense Gun Control
Common Sense Gun Control
Well, yeah, I’m
going to dive into the gun control deep water, and here’s a heads up. I was
eight when I received my first gun, a Mossberg .20-gauge bolt action, three
shot clip, and four years later a Browning Sweet 16. Along the way, toward
college, I acquired a .22 riffle and a .22 pistol. When I headed to the
University, I took all of them with me, and when I checked into Razorback Hall,
carrying my guns, with a pistol tucked in my belt, a faculty member opened the
dorm door for me. So, don’t try to paint me as a liberal, anti-gun activist.
That won’t fly. I’ve spent more time in the woods and on Arkansas lakes and
rivers than 95% of the folks who are whining about someone trying to take away
their guns and Second Amendment rights. Okay?
Now, let’s look at
a key part of the problem. The problem is not Richard carrying guns into
Razorback Hall. It’s really very simple: It is allowing guns that are designed
strictly for the purpose of killing as many people as possible in the shortest
period of time to be in the hands of someone who wants to terrorize a school,
concert, or a city street. That deranged person’s goal is to create havoc and
kill as many people as possible. That’s the problem, and certain guns are a key
part of the problem.
Of course, if you
are in a Special Forces Squad trapped in a Middle Eastern remote village and
are about to be attacked by 50 ISIS fighters, a gun that will kill as many of
the terrorist as possible in the shortest amount of time is the weapon you want
to have in your hands. However, that same weapon in the hands of a school
terrorist almost guarantees a huge number of causalities. When a gun is capable
of firing astounding numbers of high caliber rounds in a very short period of
time and the person using the gun is intent upon killing as many people as
possible, you can insert the name of all the school massacres and that weapon
is 90% of problem. Remove that weapon from the mix, and you reduce the number
of deaths.
All guns are
designed with a purpose in mind, and shotguns and other weapons of that nature
are designed to kill small game. Of course, rifles that are used for deer
hunting are made with that in mind. Weapons that are made to kill people have
two different identifying characteristics. They are automatic, rapid fire,
enabling the shooter to inflict as much damage as possible on the human target
or targets, and the ammunition is of sufficient caliber to do as much physical
damage to that target as possible. That’s why there are so many causalities.
The high caliber specially designed rounds are to kill and rip into the human
body, and what would be a minor flesh wound with a .22 caliber bullet, becomes
a fatal shot when the round comes from a military weapon.
If we are honest,
with our evaluation of the problem, we will realize that even with the toughest
gun laws imaginable, we can never completely eliminate gun related deaths.
However, we can reduce them. I know you can hunt deer with an AR-15, but you
can also hunt deer with hand grenades. Yes, I am proposing we eliminate the
ownership of weapons specifically designed to kill humans. Those weapons belong
in the military, and not in the hand of a mentally ill shooter, and don’t give
me the old guns don’t kill people kill people kill people crap, because that’s
the biggest lie in the Second Amendment argument.
Guns that are made
with the premise that they will be used to kill humans should be in the hands
of the military, and unless we make that a mandate, we will never stop the
massacres of our school children. Hunting rifles that haven’t been modified and
other weapons used for hunting and sports of that nature can kill, but because
of the time it takes to reload, and, if the weapon is not a modified, automatic
firing weapon, the deaths in any encounter with a person who is intent upon
killing innocent people will drop. No, the killing of school children won’t
stop, but the number of deaths will drop significantly.
After the horrific
Sandy Hook School killing of first and second graders in Connecticut, the state
enacted some strict gun ownership laws. The gun related deaths dropped
dramatically. So that blows the idea that gun control doesn’t work.
Now, a few words
to our congressmen and senators: If you can vote against removing military
weapons from the hands of the terrorists who kill school children, then you
have sold your soul to the NRA, have the spine of a jellyfish, and have the
blood of hundreds of innocent victims on your hands.
No, we can’t realistically stop all the
school shooting, but we can reduce the number of deaths. Does the Second
Amendment give you the unrestricted right to have any weapon? Can you carry a
bazooka or ring your vest with hand grenades, or put howitzers in your front
yard or drive a tank through your downtown? No, of course you can’t! Those
weapons are restricted to the military, thank God! Are your Second Amendment
rights more important than the deaths of hundreds of innocent individuals? What
if one of those students were your child?
Sunday, February 18, 2018
thenorphletpaperboy: Don't Tear Down our Monuments!
thenorphletpaperboy: Don't Tear Down our Monuments!: ARKANSAS By Richard Mason Don't tear down our...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)