Trees and City Heat
Trees may be the
answer to one of our city center’s health problems. One significant cause of
death in our cities is directly related to heat exhaustion, and that occurs
when the body overheats to the point where either a heat stroke or heart
failure overcomes a person, and their body’s functions are impaired. A few extra
degrees of heat can be the difference between life and death. That’s where
trees help. Since the population in most cities is concentrated in the core of
the city, elevated temperatures in that area effect more individuals, and that
is where trees save lives. Actual infrared measurements have recorded that
almost all city centers have heat islands, with temperatures from 6 to 15
degrees hotter than the suburbs, and studies have proven the absence of trees
is the difference. These heat islands exist in almost every city of any size,
and persons living there, which are exposed to those elevated temperature, have
a much greater risk of dying of a heat related problem than others in shady
suburbs.
The Texas Tree
Foundation, the group who has researched this problem, has focused on tree
canopies, because heat island have a direct relationship to a city’s tree
canopy. There are no other reasons, and not only are city centers hotter, they
have less moisture and consequently more dust, which brings about allergic reactions
and more health problems. Trees solve these problems by secreting moisture.
The
Foundation has collected a mountain of data to illustrate the benefits of
having a tree canopy, and their research shows how that canopy can combat the
heat island effect that is present in almost all of our downtowns. The heat island effect is caused by the
absence of any or very little tree canopy, and when temperatures are measured
in the suburbs vs the downtown it becomes very obvious. Towns with a fair to
good tree canopies record much lower temperatures than town without trees. Some
of the best towns have a heat island effect of only 6 degrees hotter than a
tree lined suburb, and the worst have an astounding plus 15 degrees in towns
without any substantial tree canopy.
When we have our 100 degree days, usually
recorded at the airport away from an asphalt-concrete downtown, the actual downtown
temperature could be as high as 115 degrees, and that is not the heat index,
which, of course, will be much higher. If you plug in the heat index, cities
with a heat island could easily have downtown temperatures of over 120 degrees.
In 2011 Dallas had
temperatures that topped 100 degrees for 40 consecutive days and 112 people
died. Nearly half of those deaths were directly attributed to the heat wave
according to the Foundation’s research. In the United States an estimated
30,000 people die from heat-related deaths annually, and that is twice as many
as are killed by gun violence.
The problem is
simple. Almost all city’s centers have impermeable surfaces such concrete and
asphalt, which soak up the sun’s heat and causes to the heat island effect.
This increase in temperature is deadly to people with any respiratory problem
or children with childhood asthma. Trees can filter deadly air pollution and
protect people from chronic respiratory illness.
The problem is not
just in the Southwest where 100 degree days are common, it is now becoming a
worldwide problem because of global warming. Paris has just experienced a
brutal heat wave, and is responding with a reforestation effort to ensure 50%
of the city’s land is planted by 2030. Here in the United States a recent study
indicates replanting trees lost to urban development could reduce between one
sixth and two-thirds of our carbon pollution. There is an estimated 255 million
suitable acres available for tree-planting just in the U. S., an area the size
of Texas.
I think we see the
problem and the solution, so how are we doing here in Arkansas, “The Natural
State”? Actually, we’re doing a lousy job, but there are bright spots. The city
of Fayetteville is committed to a 40% tree canopy, and is working to maintain
that even while having to replace older trees. Little Rock has a City Street
Tree Origination that is committed to planting trees, and they are doing a
great job, but they could use more help from the city and more volunteers.
I know trees are old
hat here in Arkansas, and slash and burn is still in a lot of minds. I had a
friend look at a lot, which the day before had beautiful trees. The lot had just
been bulldozed for a used car lot. She said, “Well, that’s sure an
improvement.” And she meant it. We have got to overcome the thought that a
blank parking lot is a proper way to have parking and trees just get in the
way.
Just last week, here
in El Dorado, on north Washington Avenue, two healthy, 100 year old oaks, which
were City Street Trees, were cut down. We have a long way to go when healthy
100 year old oaks are cut down without good reason. However, we’re making some
progress, although it’s pretty hit and miss. I have personally gotten over a
1000 trees planted in our downtown, but on the ugliest streets in town I have
been stonewall, even after I offered to buy the trees. Every town of any size
has its ugly treeless streets and here in El Dorado we have two; north West
Avenue and Hillsboro Street. I’m not
picking on El Dorado. My home town is just an example of almost every town in
the state.
But planting trees
in city centers is just a small part of the problem. We need to plant trees in
every available spot, and we can’t possible plant too many trees. Plant then
around bus stops, in parking lots, on city sidewalks, and in every green space
in your town. However, all trees aren’t created equal. Try to pick a recommended
street tree with wide leafy foliage. Here in Arkansas we can easily plant
native trees in the late fall and winter, if we will just use a little
initiative to find them, or spend a few bucks with a local nursery.
Yes, trees will grow in highway medians, and
we have hundreds of miles of mowed grass without tree one. Trees don’t have to
be on city streets to improve air quality and cut down on pollution. They can
be anywhere, and there is not a single reason why we don’t have trees in our
highway medians.
We were once the
Bear State, but we killed off nearly all the bears so we changed to the Natural
State. Will we repeat history by losing so much tree cover that one day we’ll
be too embarrassed to call ourselves “The Natural State?”
No comments:
Post a Comment